Salsa Flyway vs Sonder Camino

Both published charts held against each other, on the specs that decide what the bike carries.

The short answer

The Flyway takes frame bag space; the Camino takes tire clearance and the rack path. Which matters more is your route, not a scoreboard.

Assembled from the differences below rather than written over them, so it cannot drift from the table. Every figure is the manufacturer's; nobody here has ridden either bike.

Where they differ

4 of the 6 things we can compare come out differently. The rest are close enough not to decide anything.

Frame bag space

62 cm² more on the Flyway
Salsa Flyway
1714 cm²
Sonder Camino
1652 cm²

Front-triangle area at the largest size, computed from stack, reach and seat angle. It is what decides how much full-frame bag you can run, and a frame bag is the one place weight sits low and central.

Widest published tire

5mm more on the Camino
Salsa Flyway
50mm on 700c / 29in, 51mm on 650b / 27.5in
Sonder Camino
50mm on 700c / 29in, 56mm on 650b / 27.5in

The frame figure, not the fork's — forks are routinely cut for more rubber than the rear triangle. Loaded, tire width is also seat-pack clearance: a big tire and a sagging pack compete for the same space.

Rear rack

Camino is the one you can bolt a rack to without hunting for parts
Salsa Flyway
Needs an extra part — Rack-Lock seatpost collar
Sonder Camino
Bolts straight on

Read from each maker's own mount wording. An adapter is a real cost the price tag does not mention, and 'not published' is not the same as no — it just is not something to buy a rack on.

Chainstay

9mm longer on the Camino
Salsa Flyway
425mm
Sonder Camino
434mm

The gap between seat tube and rear axle, which a rack, panniers and your heels all share. Longer is more room for a load; shorter is a more compact bike. Which you want is a preference, not a winner.

Side by side

Including the rows where the two are level, because a spec that doesn't separate them is still a spec you might be checking.

Salsa FlywaySonder Camino
Frame bag space1714 cm²1652 cm²
Widest published tire50mm on 700c / 29in, 51mm on 650b / 27.5in50mm on 700c / 29in, 56mm on 650b / 27.5in
Rear rackNeeds an extra part — Rack-Lock seatpost collarBolts straight on
Fork cargo mountsPublishedPublished
Frame bottle positions3not published as a count
Chainstay425mm434mm
Sizes65
FrameCarbonAluminum

Drawn to scale

Largest published size of each, built from the charts rather than illustrated. The front triangle is the part that decides frame bag fit.

Salsa Flyway — X-Large. Front triangle ≈ 1714 cm² · effective top tube 620mm · seat tube 575mm
Salsa Flyway in size X-Large, drawn to scale from Salsa's published geometry. The shaded area is the front triangle — roughly 1714 cm² of space for a frame bag. Wheels are indicative; frame lines are accurate.
Salsa
Flyway
$3,499 · 6 sizes
Full geometry and which bags fit →
Sonder
Camino
£1,649 · 5 sizes
Full geometry and which bags fit →

Other comparisons with these two