This opens a search on Amazon rather than a product page — we haven't verified a direct link for this one, and the results may include other brands.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.
BRS BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove — Specs & Analysis
Manufacturer specifications, compared against every other cooking gear in our database. We do not test gear in the field — we measure, verify, and compare.
The BRS-3000T weighs just 25 grams and costs less than a restaurant meal. It's the lightest functional canister stove on the market, screwing directly onto an Isobutane canister. Build quality is basic and there's no simmer control to speak of, but for boiling water it gets the job done.
Who Is the BRS BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove Best For?
Budget ultralight bikepackers who only need to boil water. If that describes your riding style, the BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove should be at the top of your shortlist. It sits in the Cooking Gear category alongside 17 other products we track.
How It Compares
At 25g and $20, the BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove is 15g heavier than the lightest option in this category (the Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork at 10g). The most budget-friendly option is the Sea to Summit Alpha Light Spork at $10.
The price-to-weight ratio comes in at $80 per 100g — a premium price point, but you're paying for quality, materials, and design that justify the investment for serious bikepackers.
What We Like
- +Absurdly light at 25g — the lightest canister stove available
- +Incredible value at under $20
- +Compact enough to disappear in any cook kit
- +Surprisingly decent boil times for its size
Watch Out For
- −Virtually no simmer control — it's full blast or off
- −Pot supports are small and tippy with larger pots
- −Poor wind resistance without a windscreen
The Bottom Line
We haven't scored the BRS BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove, and neither has anyone else we can cite. It's here for its verified specifications and dimensions, which is what the fit tools run on — a score is an editorial judgement, and we don't hand one out until someone has a basis for it. What this page can tell you is measured: 25g, $20, and how both sit against every other cooking gear product we track.
The price and weight above have not yet been checked against the manufacturer's own page. We are working through the catalogue and saying so as we go, rather than letting silence imply otherwise.
Specifications and dimensions come from the sources listed above. Where a page draws on first-hand riding, it says so.
What it packs down to
BRS publishes a packed size of 1.5 x 1.5 x 2 in, which is 0.1 litres as a folded block. Of the 55 bags we track that publish a capacity, 55 have room for it and 0 do not.
Volume is computed from BRS's own packed size, treating a two-dimension figure as a stuff sack. Bag capacities are the makers' published figures, not ours — 12 of the bags we hold dimensions for publish no capacity and are left out of the count rather than assumed. A stuff sack does not reshape itself, so read the headroom as room to spare rather than a guarantee it goes in easily.
How it compares
Against the 18 cooking gear products we hold published specs for.
At 25g the BRS-3000T Ultralight Stove is lighter than 15 of 17 alternatives we track, which makes it among the lightest we track. The category median is 111g.
At $20 it undercuts 15 of 17 of them, against a median of $43. That works out at $80 per 100g — above the $49 median for cooking gear products.
Weight and price come from published specifications. Cost per 100g is a blunt measure — it rewards light gear and says nothing about durability or whether the thing works — so treat it as one input, not a verdict.
More in Cooking Gear
Compact stoves, cooksets, and utensils for trailside meals.