Salsa Stormchaser vs Surly Straggler 650b
Both published charts held against each other, on the specs that decide what the bike carries.
The short answer
The Stormchaser takes frame bag space and dropper compatibility; the Straggler 650b takes the rack path and price. Which matters more is your route, not a scoreboard.
Assembled from the differences below rather than written over them, so it cannot drift from the table. Every figure is the manufacturer's; nobody here has ridden either bike.
Where they differ
5 of the 8 things we can compare come out differently. The rest are close enough not to decide anything.
Frame bag space
176 cm² more on the StormchaserFront-triangle area at the largest size, computed from stack, reach and seat angle. It is what decides how much full-frame bag you can run, and a frame bag is the one place weight sits low and central.
Rear rack
Straggler 650b is the one you can bolt a rack to without hunting for partsRead from each maker's own mount wording. An adapter is a real cost the price tag does not mention, and 'not published' is not the same as no — it just is not something to buy a rack on.
Dropper post
only the Stormchaser publishes dropper routingA dropper cannot be strapped to, so fitting one rules out almost every seat pack and leaves rail-mounted bags at a fraction of the volume. It is a capability and a constraint at once.
Chainstay
29mm longer on the StormchaserThe gap between seat tube and rear axle, which a rack, panniers and your heels all share. Longer is more room for a load; shorter is a more compact bike. Which you want is a preference, not a winner.
From
$100 between themManufacturer's cheapest complete build. Every spec above belongs to the frame and does not change between builds of the same model, so the cheapest build of the right frame is usually the right answer.
Side by side
Including the rows where the two are level, because a spec that doesn't separate them is still a spec you might be checking.
| Salsa Stormchaser | Surly Straggler 650b | |
|---|---|---|
| Frame bag space | 1630 cm² | 1454 cm² |
| Widest published tire | 50mm on 700c / 29in, 50mm on 650b / 27.5in | 50mm on 700c / 29in, 50mm on 650b / 27.5in |
| Rear rack | Needs an extra part — Rack-Lock seatpost collar | Bolts straight on |
| Fork cargo mounts | Published | Published |
| Frame bottle positions | 3 | not published as a count |
| Dropper post | Compatible | Not compatible |
| Chainstay | 435mm | 406mm |
| From | $1,799 | $1,699 |
| Sizes | 7 | 6 |
| Frame | 6066-T6 aluminum | 4130 Chromoly steel |
Drawn to scale
Largest published size of each, built from the charts rather than illustrated. The front triangle is the part that decides frame bag fit.
