Esker Japhy vs Salsa Beargrease

Both published charts held against each other, on the specs that decide what the bike carries.

The short answer

The Beargrease is ahead on frame bag space, tire clearance and fork cargo mounts. Nothing here goes the other way.

Assembled from the differences below rather than written over them, so it cannot drift from the table. Every figure is the manufacturer's; nobody here has ridden either bike.

Where they differ

4 of the 6 things we can compare come out differently. The rest are close enough not to decide anything.

Frame bag space

106 cm² more on the Beargrease
Esker Japhy
1523 cm²
Salsa Beargrease
1629 cm²

Front-triangle area at the largest size, computed from stack, reach and seat angle. It is what decides how much full-frame bag you can run, and a frame bag is the one place weight sits low and central.

Widest published tire

46mm more on the Beargrease
Esker Japhy
71mm on 700c / 29in
Salsa Beargrease
76mm on 700c / 29in, 102mm on 650b / 27.5in, 117mm on 26in

The frame figure, not the fork's — forks are routinely cut for more rubber than the rear triangle. Loaded, tire width is also seat-pack clearance: a big tire and a sagging pack compete for the same space.

Fork cargo mounts

only the Beargrease publishes somewhere to bolt a cage
Esker Japhy
None published
Salsa Beargrease
Published

Cage mounts on the fork blades. This moves weight low and off the bars, which is where a heavy bar roll does the most to the steering.

Chainstay

10mm longer on the Beargrease
Esker Japhy
430mm
Salsa Beargrease
440mm

The gap between seat tube and rear axle, which a rack, panniers and your heels all share. Longer is more room for a load; shorter is a more compact bike. Which you want is a preference, not a winner.

Side by side

Including the rows where the two are level, because a spec that doesn't separate them is still a spec you might be checking.

Esker JaphySalsa Beargrease
Frame bag space1523 cm²1629 cm²
Widest published tire71mm on 700c / 29in76mm on 700c / 29in, 102mm on 650b / 27.5in, 117mm on 26in
Rear rackNeeds an extra partNeeds an extra part
Fork cargo mountsNone publishedPublished
Frame bottle positions22
Chainstay430mm440mm
Sizes45
FrameQuad-butted 4130 chromoly steelCarbon

Drawn to scale

Largest published size of each, built from the charts rather than illustrated. The front triangle is the part that decides frame bag fit.

Esker Japhy — S4/XL. Front triangle ≈ 1523 cm² · effective top tube 660mm · seat tube 475mm
Esker Japhy in size S4/XL, drawn to scale from Esker's published geometry. The shaded area is the front triangle — roughly 1523 cm² of space for a frame bag. Wheels are indicative; frame lines are accurate.
Salsa Beargrease — X-Large. Front triangle ≈ 1629 cm² · effective top tube 654mm · seat tube 521mm
Salsa Beargrease in size X-Large, drawn to scale from Salsa's published geometry. The shaded area is the front triangle — roughly 1629 cm² of space for a frame bag. Wheels are indicative; frame lines are accurate.
Esker
Japhy
Price not published · 4 sizes
Full geometry and which bags fit →
Salsa
Beargrease
$2,319.99 · 5 sizes
Full geometry and which bags fit →

Other comparisons with these two